The National Association of Science Writers and its Awards Committee are pleased to announce the winners of the 2023 NASW Science in Society (SIS) Journalism Awards. This year, NASW is awarding prizes in six categories: Books, Science Reporting, Science Features, Longform Narratives, Series, and Commentary. The winners are:
-
In the Books category, When Children Feel Pain: From Everyday Aches to Chronic Conditions by freelance journalist Rachel Rabkin Peachman and associate professor Anna C. Wilson of Oregon Health & Science University, published by Harvard University Press.
-
In the Science Reporting category, “How Indigenous Sea Gardens Produced Massive Amounts of Food for Millennia” by freelance journalist Ashley Braun, published by Hakai Magazine.
-
In the Science Features category, “Thousands of Migrant Workers Died in Qatar’s Extreme Heat. The World Cup Forced a Reckoning” by Aryn Baker, senior international correspondent for TIME magazine.
-
In the Longform Narratives category, “A Field at a Crossroads: Genetics and Racial Mythmaking” by Ashley Smart, senior editor, features, for Undark.
-
In the Series category, “Fighting for Air” by freelance journalist and former Milwaukee Journal Sentinel housing reporter Talis Shelbourne, published by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
-
In the Commentary category, “We Can Fight Monkeypox Without Hysteria or Homophobia” by freelance science journalist Kai Kupferschmidt, published by The New York Times.
The SIS award winners in each category will receive or share a cash prize of $2,000. The 2023 NASW Awards will be presented on Saturday, Oct. 7, in Boulder, Colo. as part of the ScienceWriters2023 national conference. Follow hashtags #SciWri23 and #SciWriAwards on social media for ongoing awardee celebrations.
Rachel Rabkin Peachman, Anna C Wilson
“Few books so expertly blend deeply reported research with practical and actionable tips the way this one does,” the judges said. Noting the complexity of childhood pain — whether from bumps and scrapes or chronic conditions and surgeries — and the lifelong effects of leaving it untreated, the judges further stated, “The authors, a science journalist with a personal history of chronic pain and a pediatric pain psychologist, team up to make a persuasive case for better treatments of childhood pain, many of which do not involve medication.”
Ashley Braun
“This fascinating article challenges the reader to re-examine beliefs about oyster and clam harvesting leading to exploitation and to find something else more nuanced and more hopeful,” the judges said. “Braun finds both academics and practitioners who believe re-creating past indigenous practices of ‘sea gardening’ can restore sustainable harvests in ways that beautifully capture concepts of reciprocity, and cultural and spiritual ways of knowing.”
Aryn Baker
“Since the attention from the World Cup, Qatar has become a kind of laboratory for heat protection policies. [Baker] acknowledges the improvements Qatar has made in reducing heat-related deaths, while highlighting the continued failures, loopholes, and data gaps,” the judges said. “This deeply reported story has implications for every country dealing with the changing risks of outdoor work.”
Ashley Smart
“This tour de force traces the origins and implications of a dangerous myth: that race is a biological category,” the judges said. They lauded Smart’s adroitness in weaving a narrative that begins with the mass shooting at Tops supermarket, [and goes on] to show how researchers began categorizing humans in the 18th century, and how such efforts have fueled scientific racism. “Even today, the problematic use of continental ancestral groupings continues to shape practices in genetics research, leading to false conclusions about biological differences that thrive in the dark corners of the Internet,” the judges noted. “This well-reported and skillfully told story challenges you to think about the limits of population genetics research and the role of ‘objective’ science in modern society.”
Talis Shelbourne
Through a “stunning combination of data, science, accountability and solutions journalism,” the judges stated, Shelborne reveals the unequal burden of childhood asthma in the city. “The series shows the anguish of families whose kids repeatedly end up in the ER from uncontrolled pediatric asthma, and how inequities in housing, race and income place additional risk on children in underserved communities,” the judges said. “Shelbourne provides helpful Q&As and examples of successful programs to empower families and communities.”
Kai Kupferschmidt
The judges called the essay “well-timed, clear-headed, and affecting.” They added: “Noting that playing down the risk factors of the disease amounts to ‘homophobia by neglect,’ Kupferschmidt elegantly points to the need for thoughtful public health approaches that engage the communities affected while warning those most at risk of this serious and painful disease.”
In addition to the 2023 SIS winners, the judges would like to recognize entries that were finalists in the competition:
Finalists in the Books category:
- How to Sell a Poison: The Rise, Fall, and Toxic Return of DDT by Elena Conis, associate professor at University of California, Berkeley, published by Bold Type Books. - At Home on an Unruly Planet by freelance science journalist Madeline Ostrander, published by Henry Holt and Co.Finalists in the Science Reporting category:
- “Monkeypox in Africa: The Science The World Ignored” by Max Kozlov, science reporter at Nature. - “Pain in Children is Often Ignored. For Children of Color, It’s Even Worse" by freelance science journalist Rachel Rabkin Peachman, published by The New York Times.Finalists in the Science Features category:
- “The Arctic Revolution That’s Changing Climate Science” by Bloomberg News Toronto bureau chief Danielle Bochove in Bloomberg Green. - “Is Death Real?” by freelance science journalist Esther Landhuis, published by Popular Mechanics.Finalists in the Longform Narratives category:
- “‘Where the Bats Hung Out’: How a Basement Hideaway at UC Berkeley Nurtured a Generation of Blind Innovators” by Isabella Cueto, chronic disease reporter at STAT. - “‘I'm the Operator’: The Aftermath of a Self-Driving Tragedy” by freelance journalist Lauren Smiley, published by WIRED.Finalists in the Series category:
- “Climate and Punishment” by reporter and research editor Alleen Brown and senior research engineer Akil Harris of The Intercept. - “Stillbirths: When Babies Die Before Taking Their First Breath” by reporter Duaa Eldeib of ProPublica.Finalists in the Commentary category:
- “The End of Alzheimer's” by freelance journalist Lisa Marshall, published by WebMD. - “A Bird By Any Other Name” by freelance science journalist Ariana Remmel, published by Audubon Magazine.
Aparna Vidyasagar
In addition to the final judging committee, NASW thanks the volunteers who served on the SIS preliminary judging committees: Beryl Benderly (freelance), Brendan Borrell (freelance), Katherine Bourzac (freelance), Kimberly Cauvel (Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission), Rina Diane Caballar (freelance), John Carey (freelance), Anne Connor (freelance), Liz Devitt (freelance), Miriam Fauzia (Inverse), Desiree Hagen (KOTZ), Maggie Jackson (freelance), Amanda Keener (freelance), Katherine Kornei (freelance), Usha Lee McFarling (STAT), Amy Nordrum (MIT Technology Review), Karen Pinchin (freelance), Julia Rosen (freelance), Shawna Williams (freelance).
The Awards Committee members who worked on this year’s SIS awards are: Eric Bender (freelance), Grant Currin (Columbia University), Anna Nowogrodski (Nature), Elliot Richman (freelance) and Rachel Zamzow (freelance/The Open Notebook).
First awarded in 1972, the NASW Science and Society Journalism Awards were established to recognize investigative or interpretive reporting about the sciences and their impact on society. Intended to encourage critical, probing work that would not receive an award from an interest group, NASW presents these journalism awards without subsidy from any professional or commercial interest. The annual SIS honors have highlighted innovative reporting shaped by a diverse variety of perspectives — going well beyond the research findings and considering the associated ethical problems and social effects. The awards are especially prestigious because they are judged by accomplished peers.
Entries for the next awards cycle, recognizing material published or broadcast in 2023, are due February 1, 2024. Nomination forms will be available at https://www.nasw.org/awards/sis beginning December 2023.
All NASW awards strive to showcase timely coverage and exemplary work, particularly those by underrepresented creatives tackling diverse, overlooked issues and communities. Judges especially consider diversity in topics, sources, audience, and authors to be a critical component of excellence. Nominations are not limited to the NASW membership, and media professionals are encouraged to submit entries on behalf of peers, colleagues, and mentees.
The 2023 NASW Science in Society Journalism Award winners
Photos courtesy of awardees. Image credits: Judi Rabkin; Oregon Health & Science University; Lindsay Thomas Photos; Aryn Baker; Liese Jones; Talis Shelbourne; Valeria Mitelman
Founded in 1934 with a mission to fight for the free flow of science news, NASW is an organization of ~2,800 professional journalists, authors, editors, producers, public information officers, students and people who write and produce material intended to inform the public about science, health, engineering, and technology. To learn more, visit www.nasw.org and follow NASW on LinkedIn.
